PBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of 2.24% compared to PBF Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 5.6%. PBF Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.67% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 19.43%.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.62, signalling downside risk potential of -7.88%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $200.11 which suggests that it could grow by 13.01%. Given that Marathon Petroleum Corp. has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, Inc., analysts believe Marathon Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than PBF Energy, Inc..

PBF Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.285%.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. PBF Energy, Inc. pays 22.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PBF Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. PBF Energy, Inc.'s net income of $171.7M is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, PBF Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.42x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 2.24% compared to PBF Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 13.05%. PBF Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.67% beat Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.34%.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.62, signalling downside risk potential of -7.88%. On the other hand Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.88 which suggests that it could grow by 24.11%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, Inc., analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than PBF Energy, Inc..

PBF Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.664%.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PBF Energy, Inc. pays 22.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PBF Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are larger than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. PBF Energy, Inc.'s net income of $171.7M is lower than Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $262.6M. Notably, PBF Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.27x for Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 2.24% compared to PBF Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 0.48%. PBF Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.67% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65%.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.62, signalling downside risk potential of -7.88%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $150.05 which suggests that it could grow by 4.04%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, Inc., analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than PBF Energy, Inc..

PBF Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.557%.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. PBF Energy, Inc. pays 22.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PBF Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $34.5B. PBF Energy, Inc.'s net income of $171.7M is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $165M. Notably, PBF Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 39.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.45x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy Corp. has a net margin of 2.24% compared to PBF Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 3.3%. PBF Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.67% beat Valero Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 5.27%.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.62, signalling downside risk potential of -7.88%. On the other hand Valero Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $187.17 which suggests that it could fall by -2.17%. Given that PBF Energy, Inc. has more downside risk than Valero Energy Corp., analysts believe Valero Energy Corp. is more attractive than PBF Energy, Inc..

PBF Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.384% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.532%.

PBF Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. Valero Energy Corp. offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. PBF Energy, Inc. pays 22.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy Corp. pays out 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PBF Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are smaller than Valero Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $32.2B. PBF Energy, Inc.'s net income of $171.7M is lower than Valero Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, PBF Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Valero Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 39.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PBF Energy, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.49x for Valero Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.